Skip to content
november
Sign in

Agents suggest. People decide.

november drafts fast, but nothing reaches the public until a person has read and approved it (by default, someone other than its author), and every fact in it points back to the candidate's own words.

The path every piece takes

Rebuttals, explainers and posts all move through the same control points. Agents can draft, score and recommend at any step. They cannot approve, release, share or override: the platform refuses them.

  1. Step 1

    Submit

    The author

    Sends a draft to review. november scores it on arrival: how much of it is cited, how much an agent wrote, and the critic's KPIs with reasons.

  2. Step 2

    Approve

    A second person, by default

    Someone with an approve role. By default that is someone who neither wrote nor submitted the draft, so nobody approves their own work; a campaign of one can turn that off, and the switch is on the record.

  3. Step 3

    Release

    A person, after approval

    Only approved work goes public. This gate always blocks; there is no way around it.

  4. Step 4

    Retire

    A person

    Takes a published piece down. The record of what ran, and who decided, stays.

Grounded or silent

Every claim a draft makes cites the speech, town hall or meeting it came from. Reviewers open the citation and read the candidate's words in place. When the record has nothing to say, november says nothing.

A rebuttal draft in the compose screen. One sentence's citation is open, showing the town hall transcript with the cited words highlighted. A side panel shows the AI share of the draft and five guardrail checks, all passing.
A draft sentence with its citation open on the transcript, the AI share of the version, and the campaign's guardrails checked against it. Fictional demo world: candidate Maya Okafor, Riverbend-14.

  • AI share on every draft

    Each version shows how much of its text an agent wrote and how much a person did, so a reviewer knows what they are reading.

  • Internal meetings stay internal

    Staff meetings can inform a draft, but they are never cited in public. Published pieces and the explainer cite only public sources.

Guardrails written as the campaign's own principles

A campaign states what it will and won't do, in its own words, and decides which principles block a draft and which warn the reviewer. november checks every version against them.

Grounded or silent
Every factual sentence cites something the candidate actually said, or it isn't said.
Enforcement: Blocks
Quote fidelity
When a piece quotes the candidate, it uses the exact words from the cited transcript.
Enforcement: Blocks
No manipulation
Persuade with the record. No fear, no false urgency, no contempt.
Enforcement: Flags for the reviewer
Don't carry the attack's frame
A position can rule out an opponent's figure or phrase. The critic flags a draft that repeats it.
Enforcement: Flags for the reviewer

Scores that give their reasons

The critic scores each draft for audience fit, brand and message, and says why, sentence by sentence. A draft below an enforced threshold can't be approved unless a reviewer overrides it and writes down why.

The review drawer for a childcare rebuttal, with Approve and Return buttons. Below them, KPI scores for audience fit, brand and message, each followed by the critic's reasons with the sentence numbers they refer to.
A reviewer's view of a draft in review: each KPI with its score, its threshold and the critic's reasons. Fictional demo world: candidate Maya Okafor, Riverbend-14.

  • Overrides are on the record

    When a person approves past a failing score, november keeps the flag and the reviewer's note beside the version, where the next reviewer will see it.

  • An audit trail of every control point

    Every submit, approval, return, release, retire and override records who acted, and for an agent, which person it acted for. The log is append-only.

Works without a model, and says so

Every agent in november has a mode with no AI at all: search, rules and templates. If a model is slow or unavailable, the campaign keeps working.

A result produced that way is marked as such, so nobody mistakes a rule for a judgement.

If governance pauses AI for a session, the console says so plainly and the work goes on by hand. november never retries around a pause.

Watch a draft go through review

The demo is a working console for a fictional race. Sign in, open a draft's citations, read the critic's reasons and approve it as a second person.

See the demoSign in