Skip to content
november
Sign in

Campaigns that trust each other share what works.

When one campaign answers an attack well, a neighbour facing the same attack can take a copy, sources and all, and run it under its own name after its own review.

Every campaign stays sovereign

november connects campaigns without merging them. Each one keeps three things, whoever it works with.

  • Its data

    A campaign never reads another campaign's records. Nothing leaves until a person offers it.

  • Its brand

    A shared piece goes out under the receiving campaign's own brand, never the sender's.

  • Its approvals

    A copy enters the receiver's own review. Its people decide whether it goes out.

How a share travels

Sharing copies a piece, it never links to one. The copy carries where it came from, so every campaign can check the record behind it.

  1. Step 1

    Offer

    A person picks a peer campaign or the whole network and adds a note. Agents can't share.

  2. Step 2

    Accept

    The receiver gets a frozen copy with its sources, scores and lineage. Later edits at the origin don't travel with it.

  3. Step 3

    Approve under its own brand

    The copy lands in the receiver's work, unpublished, and goes through its own control points.

  4. Step 4

    Report back

    The origin sees where its piece was adopted and how each copy is doing there.

The share dialog for a published childcare rebuttal. It explains that the receiver gets a frozen copy with its sources, scores and lineage. Harbor-9 is selected from a list that also offers the Forward Network and the whole network, with a note to the receiver.
Riverbend-14 offers its childcare rebuttal to Harbor-9, a neighbouring campaign facing the same attack. Fictional demo world: candidate Maya Okafor, Riverbend-14.
The Harbor-9 campaign's network page. The childcare rebuttal from Riverbend-14 is marked accepted, with its lineage from Riverbend-14 to Harbor-9 and the origin's scores. A notice says nothing publishes until Harbor-9's own approvals pass.
Harbor-9 accepts the copy. It is now Harbor-9's work, and nothing publishes until Harbor-9 approves it. Harbor-9 is fictional too. Fictional demo world: candidate Maya Okafor, Riverbend-14.

The network sees lineage, not content

A national peer can follow what its campaigns share, so it can see what is working across districts, without holding anyone's material.

The campaign that shared it
Its own piece, where it was adopted, and how each copy performs.
The campaign that accepted it
A frozen copy with sources, scores and lineage, to edit and approve as its own.
A national peer
Who shared what with whom, the scores and the performance. Never the text.
The Forward Network's network page. Under Across the network, the childcare rebuttal shared from Riverbend-14 to Harbor-9 is listed as accepted, with its lineage and scores, and the line: content stays with the campaigns in the share.
The Forward Network, a national peer, sees the share and its scores, not the rebuttal itself. The Forward Network is fictional too. Fictional demo world: candidate Maya Okafor, Riverbend-14.

A modern committee of correspondence

Before the American Revolution, towns and colonies formed committees of correspondence: independent local bodies that kept each other informed by letter. november gives campaigns the same arrangement. Each one governs itself, chooses what to send, and decides what to take.

Follow a rebuttal from one campaign to another

The demo is a working console for three fictional campaigns. Sign in, share a rebuttal from Riverbend-14 to Harbor-9, accept it there, and see what the Forward Network sees.

See the demoSign in